UConn President’s Salary Increase

Herbst Salary Raise

From the Hartford Courant 12-29-15
By: Gregory Hladky

The University of Connecticut’s Board of Trustees voted Monday to extend UConn President Susan Herbst’s contract until 2019 with an overall increase in salary and other compensation that will bring her total compensation to more than $758,000 a year in 2015.

The boost in total compensation for Herbst under the new contract amounts to a 20.7 percent increase over her current contract, which was due to expire in 2016.

A study released by the Chronicle of Higher Education in May estimated the median annual compensation for all American university presidents at $478,896 in 2013, the most recent figures available. The Institute for Policy Studies put the average compensation for top executives at public research universities like UConn at $544,554 a year in2012.

But Herbst’s new contract remains well below those of some of the highest paid public university presidents in the nation. The Chronicle of Higher Education’s survey for 2012-13 reported that nine public university presidents were making more than $1 million annually.

UConn Board Chairman Lawrence D. McHugh issued a statement saying approval of the new contract was unanimous and that the board “agreed that President Herbst is an outstanding leader and enthusiastically supported extending her contract through 2019.”

“She is a bold, decisive and innovative president,” McHugh said.

“When President Herbst was hired a little over four years ago today, in December 2010, she was offered a contract that paid her less than her predecessor and less than many other presidents of comparable institutions,” McHugh said. “The board’s view was that, if President Herbst excelled on the job, we would act to increase her compensation over time based on performance and merit.”

Under the new contract approved by the trustees, Herbst’s base salary will jump from $525,000 annually to $585,000. The new contract, which takes effect Jan. 1, also includes an additional $80,000 a year in “deferred compensation,” and a performance incentive of $40,000 annually.

As under her old contract, Herbst will also get a $38,000 annual payment toward a “supplemental retirement plan,” use of a university provided car (estimated benefit of $15,000 a year) and free housing at UConn-owned residences on the main Storrs campus and in Hartford. No housing cost estimate was available Monday.

In addition, the trustees voted to give Herbst a “retention incentive” of $125,000 once she completes five years of service as president in May 2016, and a $75,000 retention incentive to be paid if Herbst stays until the end of her new contract in 2019.

Under her original contract, the University of Connecticut Foundation was paying $145,000 of Herbst’s salary and compensation. The foundation will increase its contribution under her new contract to a total of $300,000.

“I’m grateful to the board for their support and confidence,” Herbst said in a statement issued by UConn Monday. “Our state has made incredible investments in UConn and rightfully has very high expectations in return.”

Earlier this year, UConn officials said that cuts in state funding for the university system would require them to increase student tuition by 6.5 percent to help close a potential $42.6 million deficit. Tom Breen, a spokesman for the Board of Trustees, said the entire amount of Herbst’s salary and compensation increase is being covered by the additional contribution from the UConn Foundation.

“No public dollars, and no tuition dollars are involved,” Breen said.

Herbst’s current contract was due to run out in 2016. Her original base salary when she was hired in 2010 was $500,000 a year, and she got a 5 percent raise in 2013 along with a number of other UConn management officials.

The president of the University of Massachusetts, Robert L. Caret, received a 7.5 percent increase this year to bring his annual base salary to $592,921, according to the Boston Globe. In May, the Providence Journal reported that University of Rhode Island President David M. Dooley would get a pay increase for 2014-15 to bring his salary to $330,000 a year.

Salaries and compensation for top executives at private colleges and universities are even higher than for public school chief executives.

Quinnipiac University President John L. Lahey made almost $3.8 million in 2012, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education report, making him the second-highest paid private school chief executive in the nation. First on that highest compensation list was Shirley Ann Jackson of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, who was paid a total of $7.1 million in 2012.

Hybrid Plan Memo

Hybrid Memo 10-22-14

To: SEBAC Higher Ed Leadership
From: Dan Livingston
Re: Financial Issues from Delay in Processing Hybrid Purchases Date: 10/22/14

You asked me to respond to a concern expressed to some of you that the delay in consummating Hybrid plan purchases due to the backlog could have a negative financial impact on members. To analyze this we need to look at the dual nature of the Hybrid plan.

As you know, the essence of the Hybrid is that members can choose the nature of their retirement plan when they retire instead of when they are employed. That is, the member can, upon retirement, choose to treat their entitlement as a defined benefit plan and get the same monthly benefit as they would get under the equivalent tier of SERS; or they can instead treat their entitlement as a defined contribution plan and receive their contributions, the employer contributions, and 4% annual interest on both. Those moving from ARP to the Hybrid have the same option – they don’t have to make their final decision about the nature of their plan until they retire.

For those members who choose upon retirement to treat the plan as a defined benefit plan, there is no impact from the delay in consummating the Hybrid purchase, since the member begins accumulating service once he or she is placed in “pending status” (meaning the application is complete), not once the actual purchase is consummated. So in this respect the delay is irrelevant to the member.

For those members who choose upon retirement to treat the plan as a defined contribution plan, there is also no impact, but the explanation is a little more complex. If the 4% guaranteed interest wasn’t calculated until after the purchase is completed, the member would be harmed financially because during the delay the money must be in the stable value fund which earns typically over 2 but well less than 4% interest. However, the 4% interest is calculated back to the same date (the pending status date), not the date the purchase is completed. So there is no harm done the member. The only special arrangement that needs to be made is that the stable value fund interest rate that the member earned during the delay period is offset against the 4% Hybrid rate, since otherwise the member would be getting interest twice on the same sum.

Finally some members have expressed concern that the purchase cost for past service is affected by the delay in invoicing. That is not correct. The purchase price is computed based upon the day the application goes into “pending” not the day the transfer is made.

I hope this answers the questions you’ve been receiving. The delay is unfortunate, but it attests to the strong interest members have in this new option (and unfortunately also to the very tight staffing levels at the Comptroller’s office, like everywhere else in state service). But it does not have a negative financial impact on members.

AAUP Centennial Edition of Academe


Dear Colleague,

The AAUP has reached its centennial year—a major achievement in the life cycle of a professional organization. Since its founding in 1915, the Association has sought to advance the core principles and values of the academic profession and to shape its governing standards and practices, with the goal of ensuring higher education’s contribution to the common good. While promoting, with remarkable success, the adoption of its recommended principles and standards, the Association has also monitored institutional compliance with them, investigated abuses, and published reports of its investigations.

I was privileged to take part in this work by serving for thirty-one years as a senior program officer in the AAUP’s Department of Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Governance. A historian by training (I currently hold an appointment as an adjunct professor of history at George Mason University), I was pleased to be asked to take on the task of editing a special issue of Academe commemorating the AAUP’s first hundred years.

What accounts for the persistent vitality of the AAUP’s founding principles and their continuing relevance to American higher education? Despite periods of relative inactivity, the Association has remained responsive to changes in the academic environment and in the nature of the professoriate. As a result, it has regularly developed new policies and standards to help the academic community confront the recurring threats to those core principles.

The articles in this centennial issue of Academe commemorate the AAUP’s admirable past. They describe some of the key areas—and ways—in which the AAUP has advanced standards for the academic profession.

Robert O’Neil’s opening article demonstrates the major role the AAUP has played in shaping the law of higher education.
Debra Nails describes the AAUP’s procedures for academic freedom and tenure investigations.
Jordan Kurland’s companion article comments on the most noteworthy investigations over the decades.
Ann Franke provides an overview of the AAUP’s century-long role in upholding and protecting the principles of academic freedom and tenure.
Larry Gerber’s article shows how the Association’s standards in the area of college and university government have established widely accepted norms of shared governance.
Ernst Benjamin recounts the AAUP’s initial embrace of and evolving emphasis on collective bargaining as a means of achieving the Association’s goals.
Finally, Mary Gray discusses the role played by the AAUP’s Committee on Women in the Academic Profession in developing policies relating to the status of academic women and in advancing the principles of equity and the rights of women faculty.
Periodically throughout its history, the AAUP has adjusted to financial and organizational challenges and weathered internal controversies. What lies ahead? As Franke concludes, “The continuing integrity of the Association’s positions and processes undergirds its moral authority. Only through even-handed application of its core principles will the Association retain its legitimate authority and advance its mission.” Here’s hoping that the AAUP will flourish in its second century and remain faithful to its core principles, thereby maintaining its well-deserved reputation as the authoritative voice of the academic profession.

— B. Robert Kreiser, Academe Guest Editor

Governor Malloy’s Second Round of Budget Cuts

Second Round of CT Budget Cuts
From CT News Junkie 01-20-15
by Christine Stuart

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy will be forced to order a second round of budget rescissions because his budget office Tuesday projected a nearly $121 million deficit for fiscal year 2015.

Malloy ordered $54.6 million in rescissions in November, but declining revenues and a $120 million deficiency in the Medicaid account has increased the budget deficit by $89.3 million since last month.

“We will announce additional rescissions in the very near future, and additional actions may be required to address the projected change in operating balance,” Office of Policy and Management Secretary Ben Barnes said Tuesday in his monthly letter to state Comptroller Kevin Lembo.

Revenues have declined $39.3 million since last month and spending is running $22.8 million above the budget. The biggest deficiency on the spending side is in the Medicaid account.

“A net Medicaid shortfall of $120 million is projected due to increased enrollment, difficulties in achieving the full savings levels incorporated in the budget for the medication administration and step therapy initiatives, additional hospital cost settlements, and revisions to the federal cost share for a small percentage of Medicaid clients who will be reimbursed at 50 percent as opposed to the originally anticipated 100 percent level,” Barnes wrote.

The $121 million budget deficit doesn’t reach the threshold required for Malloy to submit a deficit mitigation plan to the General Assembly. However, that possibility is getting closer.

Sen. Republican leader Len Fasano has been calling on Malloy to meet with Republican lawmakers to allow them to help cut the budget.

Malloy can rescind up to 5 percent of any line item and 3 percent of any fund on his own without seeking legislative approval.

“This was a problem yesterday, and it is an even bigger problem today,” Fasano said Tuesday. “I just don’t get it. Is there simply an inability to talk to Republicans? Every day that goes by without bipartisan action is a step in the wrong direction.”

Fasano said he’s frustrated by the governor’s decision to act unilaterally as the budget situation deteriorates.

“When it comes to state finances, everyone is disheartened by the perpetual bad news. So let’s work together to fix the problem here and now,” Fasano said Tuesday.

But even after finding a way to resolve the new $121 million deficit, Malloy still faces a $1.3 billion deficit in 2016 and a $1.5 billion in 2017. He plans on releasing a two-year budget that will close both of those deficits on Feb. 18.

Welcome to UConn-AAUP

The University of Connecticut Chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), welcomes you as a new faculty/research member of UConn. The AAUP is a national professional organization and the UConn Chapter is certified as the collective bargaining agent for the University of Connecticut’s teaching and research staff. In addition to negotiating a series of commensurate compensation packages, the UConn AAUP has a strong tradition of safeguarding the principles of shared governance within the University and promoting UConn’s unique role as the flagship research university at the State Capitol.

Connecticut State Statute requires all individuals, as designated by their work titles, to be represented by a bargaining agent to which they pay dues. The current dues/fee rate is 0.009 of annual salary and is automatically deducted from your biweekly paychecks.

The current collective bargaining contract may be found on the UConn AAUP website.